The main reasons for the opposition could easily be eliminated. They included lack of:
- an income cap
- an accreditation requirement
- a teacher minimum education/licensure requirement
- a religious prohibition
The major complaints seemed to be lack of an income cap and a minimum education requirement. Those could easily be changed (although Bill Gates is a college dropout and probably could do alright teaching technology courses, so it might make sense to include an "or equivalent" caveat to a bachelors degree requirement). The accreditation and licensure requirements continue to give the unions too much influence and set up unnecessary barriers to entry. Unless we are willing to eliminate laws that allow Pell Grants, Stafford Loans, and Utah's Carson Smith Special Needs Scholarships (vouchers) to go to religious schools, there should be no religious prohibition. Opponents argue that public schools need more money for teachers, but if they will cut back on administrative costs and set up a merit pay system, there should be plenty of money available for the best teachers. As the last legislative session showed, legislators will also be more likely to put more funding into public education if they see effective reforms taking place. For now, though, it might be good to focus on increasing the quantity and quality of charter schools, teacher performance pay, and other education reforms. Take the poll to the left and vote for which reform you feel would be most effective. Here are some examples of options that are already out there:
0 comments:
Post a Comment